The (new) American Way ...
The (new) American Way ...Since I first posted this information few weeks ago, I found at the library in Benton Harbor, Michigan, that was using a filtered system for young people, that my blog was "ACCESS DENIED - HATE SPEECH". I understand why it is considered such. It is much like "John Brown" telling those of the South that slavery is wrong. I do not like being in the position that I am in, relating to the animosity for the work I have done and what is being posted, but I do not apologize for it. The concept of evolution is a form of religion to those who espouse it. It gives them an explanation for their beginning. It is NOT science. There is no empirical manner to redo what has been done in the past. It is all speculation. Evolutionists take present-day bones that cannot be denied as to their existence, and fabricate a past existence for them that is no more than their own wish taking form. Because this form of religion is being taught as fact, I speak of it as being a lie. Were it taught as a theory, which it is, then it would be spoken of as being such.
The following is true. There is an experiment found in the previous writings I have posted on this site, "The Problem and Repair of Relativity" and "How to Form and Collapse a Gravitational Field" that gives empirical evidence as to the formation and collapse of a gravitational field. These postings will further describe what this writing is about. Take a minute to read it. Thanks.
American Center for Law and Justice
P.O. Box 90555
Washington, D.C. 20090-0555
Mr. Robert Ash,
A person may wonder why there cannot exist a state of peace between those who believe the Bible to be truthful, and those who believe that evolution is how mankind came into existence. The reason there is no common ground between the two is that there is need of deceptive lying by someone. One group of people is knowingly promoting that which is, obviously, not right – but which one is it?
It is those that believe it necessary for them to lie in order to support their claims. The real “truth” concerning evolution is that it is a THEORY. That is the absolute truth. Those who espouse this idea do not speak of it in the sense of it being a theory at all. Because they have a vested interest in this devised concept with its preemption of God, and hoping there is no actual judgement before God for what they do, they believe if they run with the herd they are safe. It is not a particular person or group of people, but it is the Christian religion in general that those who espouse the concept of evolution oppose. Evolution, the ‘big bang,’ and abortion are all pretty much tied together in the attempt to get rid of a Biblical God. Though this statement is not a surprise to anyone, the person who reads this is likely not to realize the animosity and desperate need these people have to always prove themselves a judge of life-values.
It is because of their necessity to lie, and their promoting deception at any cost, that I am stating the following and then come to a conclusion regarding them. I have done a great deal of work in understanding how and why time functions in our world as it does. I would like to list some of what I have discovered:
1. Earth’s gravitational field is propagated the speed of light. It is a product of electromagnetic energy. The equation for this force is c2=E/m. This is part of the physics trilogy. I have conducted gravitational experiments where the gravitational field has been increased and decreased according to the value of c2=e/m.
2. I determined that it is the spin of our planet that forms earth's magnetic field. Were our moon to have been created having any spin to its mass, the magnetic field formed would cause it to become slowly attracted to one of earth’s poles where it would begin approaching it till earth and our moon met.
3. The electron is composed of electromagnetic energy that has overlapped its own frequency, thus bonding frequency to frequency, and all the while maintaining the velocity of ‘c’ within. This form of mass then forms neutrons and protons, which in turn has formed our physical universe and has given all matter a common time value, which all clocks measure in an abstract manner.
4. I worked out the time structure of our solar system, as the relative time values of "core point physical time" and "surface location physical time" were compared. Then I explained what the differences between the two meant in ‘real time’ values.
5. I showed where Newton made a mistake in believing that all mass of the universe automatically attracts other masses. The force of gravity is a product of a particular kind of energy. Were this not true, then this force would have to be created in all mass at all time. planet earth uses 0.00444 kg. per sec. of gravitational frequency. Our sun expends 665 lbs. per sec. in order to perform the work that it does in keeping the planets in place.
6. Then, Einstein made a mistake in stating mass increases its own mass as it is accelerated. An accelerated mass does not gain mass, it converts the overall mass frequency so there is a decrease of energy at right angles to its motion, and a proportional increase of energy in the direction of travel. As the reader will note in "The Problem and Repair of Relativity," (this blog site) there is a major problem with our current concept of earth and sun, and their interior workings. At the 0.716 mile location inward within the core of our planet, were a mass to be released at this location, it would exceed the speed of light in one second (a mass cannot do this and yet remain a mass). This same critical distance in our sun is 400 miles inward from its core point. At that location a mass would exceed the speed of light in one second were it released there. The problem we have at home with this form of mass acceleration needs to addressed first, before mankind wanders through the universe seeking to understand why solar forces act as they do.
“Interesting,” you say, “but where is the proof, and so what if you have learned what you say you have?”
The evidence of what I have written is in the gravitational experiments I have performed. If it is possible to form and collapse a gravitational field, then the source of this force is known, and the other concepts would become obvious.
This effort was begun because of the way the theory of evolution was being lied about thirty years ago. These people have a (religious?) agenda that they pursue at all cost, and they need to be brought to account. Their object is to destroy the message and messenger. Twice in the 90's I went to Washington, D.C. and gave to Senators and Representatives information on what I had done and complained of "Agency" interference. Then, at the same time, I did the same in Lansing, Michigan. I knew at the time, what I had done would likely not be believed - and, evidently, it wasn't; I did it anyway. Just recently, April 20, 2006, I ordered a part for an ultra light engine. I returned home for the part to be sure it matched up with the picture in the book (it was an old part). When I returned to the store shortly, the owner tried to persuade me it was all wrong, even though the picture matched up. This sounds sort of "shammy", but if there is someone who would like to represent a person against the U.S. Government and how they seek to control citizens because what they promote is "politically incorrect" please contact me. It seems as though it may take a government not friendly to us in order to do this, otherwise the foxes are out counting the chickens! Partially, also, what has been done toward the work I have finished is to destroy my “web” work; that is why I have written what I have. I would like the organization exposed after an examination and determination of what I have stated. If it is true ...
Respectfully,
Duane Ertle
South Haven, Michigan

1 Comments:
Duane,
I see you're pushing that silly old pseudoscience as hard as ever. Have any success getting people to accept your "findings" over Einstein's?
Swing back by the creationtalk.com forum sometime. Maybe you could stick around to defend your "Bones and Time" copy & pastes that you leave from time to time. Or, if you're particularly brave, try a new group blog: debunking xianity.
Best regards,
Daniel
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home